SRE-1091: Bump `svgo`, `js-yaml`, `@vitest/browser-playwright` and `storybook` by claude[bot] · Pull Request #9840 · hashintel/hash

claude · 2026-09-25T15:20:03Z

Requested by Ciaran Morinan · Slack thread

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Picks up dependency upgrades that need only a version bump or a lockfile re-resolve, with no source changes.

🔗 Related links

SRE-1091 (internal)

🔍 What does this change?

svgo 3.3.4 → 3.3.5 (via @svgr/plugin-svgo) and 4.0.2 → 4.1.0 (via astro): lockfile re-resolve within existing ranges.
js-yaml 3.15.1 → 3.15.2 (via @changesets/cli → @manypkg/get-packages → read-yaml-file): lockfile re-resolve within the existing range.
@vitest/browser-playwright 4.1.10 → 4.1.11 in @hashintel/ds-components (dev dependency), which moves @vitest/browser and @vitest/mocker to 4.1.11 in line with vitest 4.1.11.
storybook 9.1.19 → 10.4.6 in @hashintel/query-editor and @hashintel/type-editor (major bump, dev dependency). Neither package has a Storybook config or stories: storybook is there only for eslint-plugin-storybook 10.3.1, whose peer range is ^10.3.1. 10.4.6 is the version @hashintel/petrinaut and @hashintel/refractive already use, and it drops @vitest/mocker 3.2.4 from the tree.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Existing CI. Locally, with Yarn 4.16.0: yarn install --immutable, yarn constraints and yarn dedupe --strategy highest --check pass. All new versions are more than seven days old.

Re-resolve svgo (3.3.5, 4.1.0) and js-yaml 3.x (3.15.2) within existing ranges, bump @vitest/browser-playwright to 4.1.11 in ds-components, and bump storybook to 10.4.6 in query-editor and type-editor to match the eslint-plugin-storybook peer range and the version used elsewhere in the repo.

vercel · 2026-09-25T15:20:09Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Ready	Preview	Sep 25, 2026 3:33pm UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Sep 25, 2026 3:33pm UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Sep 25, 2026 3:33pm UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Sep 25, 2026 3:33pm UTC

codecov · 2026-09-25T15:24:31Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.83%. Comparing base (48e1582) to head (00a4d21).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9840      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.56%   65.83%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files        1896     1900       +4     
  Lines      201506   209432    +7926     
  Branches     8028     8185     +157     
==========================================
+ Hits       132115   137885    +5770     
- Misses      67841    70001    +2160     
+ Partials     1550     1546       -4

Flag	Coverage Δ
antsi	`1.96% <ø> (?)`
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.99% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`15.35% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`38.15% <ø> (ø)`
error-stack	`90.55% <ø> (?)`
harpc-codec	`84.61% <ø> (?)`
harpc-net	`96.28% <ø> (?)`
harpc-tower	`67.11% <ø> (?)`
harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (?)`
harpc-wire-protocol	`93.85% <ø> (?)`
hash-codec	`72.09% <ø> (?)`
hash-config	`83.57% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph	`14.11% <ø> (+1.78%)`	⬆️
hash-graph-api	`33.17% <ø> (+0.97%)`	⬆️
hash-graph-atlas	`79.99% <ø> (-0.20%)`	⬇️
hash-graph-authentication	`97.34% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-authorization	`67.68% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-embeddings	`91.54% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-postgres-store	`31.94% <ø> (-0.15%)`	⬇️
hash-graph-store	`51.71% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`50.53% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (?)`
hash-graph-validation	`85.37% <ø> (?)`
hash-middleware	`90.94% <ø> (?)`
hashql-ast	`90.01% <ø> (+0.39%)`	⬆️
hashql-compiletest	`28.71% <ø> (+0.30%)`	⬆️
hashql-core	`81.47% <ø> (?)`
hashql-diagnostics	`72.85% <ø> (?)`
hashql-eval	`79.77% <ø> (-0.30%)`	⬇️
hashql-hir	`89.10% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
hashql-mir	`87.74% <ø> (+0.12%)`	⬆️
hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.77% <ø> (+0.73%)`	⬆️
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`3.27% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`12.22% <ø> (ø)`
problematic	`78.78% <ø> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed · 2026-09-25T15:31:09Z

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.61%

⚠️

6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

⚠️

Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 96 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64]`	169.2 ns	140 ns	+20.83%
⚡	`bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200]`	206.7 ns	177.5 ns	+16.43%
⚠️	`as_constant`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`constant_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`access`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A
⚠️	`runtime_not_equal`	< 1 ns	< 1 ns	N/A

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing claude/sre-1091-bump-dependencies (00a4d21) with main (387ba05)}

cursor · 2026-09-25T15:59:21Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Version-only dependency updates with no runtime code changes; Storybook 10 is dev-only for ESLint in packages that do not run Storybook.

Overview
Bumps several dev and transitive dependencies via package.json pins and a lockfile refresh, with no application source changes.

@hashintel/ds-components moves @vitest/browser-playwright from 4.1.10 → 4.1.11, aligning browser Vitest packages with the workspace’s vitest 4.1.11.

@hashintel/query-editor and @hashintel/type-editor upgrade storybook 9.1.19 → 10.4.6 (major) so it satisfies eslint-plugin-storybook 10.3.1’s peer range; Storybook is not run in these packages—only ESLint integration uses it.

The lockfile also re-resolves svgo (3.3.5 / 4.1.0) and js-yaml 3.15.2, and drops obsolete Storybook 9 and older Vitest 4.1.10 tree entries (e.g. @vitest/mocker 3.2.4).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 00a4d21. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-09-25T16:36:29Z

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 604 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.211 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.819 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 53.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.624 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$72.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$422 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 696 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$279 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.56 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.357 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.272 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.298 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 736 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$64.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 542 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 585 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$83.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 727 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.837 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 727 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.374 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 421 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 713 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$128 \mathrm{ms} \pm 932 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$510 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.69 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) labels Sep 25, 2026

claude Bot assigned CiaranMn Sep 25, 2026

claude Bot deployed to pull-request September 25, 2026 15:21 Active

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens September 25, 2026 15:23 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut-docs September 25, 2026 15:24 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut September 25, 2026 15:24 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash September 25, 2026 15:33 View deployment

claude Bot marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2026 15:59

claude Bot requested a review from CiaranMn September 25, 2026 15:59

CiaranMn approved these changes Sep 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

CiaranMn added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 28, 2026

github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 28, 2026

CiaranMn added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 28, 2026

Merged via the queue into main with commit 31287a0 Sep 28, 2026
236 checks passed

CiaranMn deleted the claude/sre-1091-bump-dependencies branch September 28, 2026 09:11

Navigation Menu

SRE-1091: Bump `svgo`, `js-yaml`, `@vitest/browser-playwright` and `storybook` - #9840

SRE-1091: Bump `svgo`, `js-yaml`, `@vitest/browser-playwright` and `storybook`#9840
CiaranMn merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/sre-1091-bump-dependencies

claude Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Sep 25, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 25, 2026

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

claude Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed Bot commented Sep 25, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.61%

Performance Changes

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 25, 2026

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

This branch was successfully deployed

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

claude Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading