Skip to content

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.7 - #9801

Open
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x
Open

Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.7#9801
hash-dependencies[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/jdx-mise-2026.x

Conversation

@hash-dependencies

@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change Pending
jdx/mise patch 2026.9.1 → 2026.9.7 2026.9.15 (+7)

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

jdx/mise (jdx/mise)

v2026.9.7

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
Ci
Security
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (3)
Updated Packages (1)

v2026.9.6

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
Ci
New Contributors
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (1)
Updated Packages (1)

v2026.9.5

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
📦 Registry
Ci
New Contributors
📦 Aqua Registry Updates
New Packages (9)
Updated Packages (5)

v2026.9.4

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
📦️ Dependency Updates
Ci
New Contributors

v2026.9.3

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
  • (bootstrap) cover ordinary dotfile history and recovery by @​jdx in #​12919
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Ci

v2026.9.2

Compare Source

🚀 Features
🐛 Bug Fixes
🚜 Refactor
📚 Documentation
⚡ Performance
🧪 Testing
  • fix unit-macos link and packslip e2e under the release workflow by @​jdx in #​12818
  • improve Windows shim failure diagnostics and cleanup by @​jdx in #​12899
📦️ Dependency Updates
📦 Registry
Chore
Ci
Security
New Contributors

✂ Note

PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
hash Ready Ready Preview Sep 28, 2026 3:42am UTC
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview Sep 28, 2026 3:42am UTC
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview Sep 28, 2026 3:42am UTC
petrinaut-docs Error Error Sep 28, 2026 3:42am UTC

Request Review

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Version-only change to the dev/CI toolchain runner; scope is limited to mise bootstrap and install behavior.

Overview
Bumps the pinned jdx/mise release from 2026.9.1 to 2026.9.7 everywhere the repo declares it: min_version in .config/mise/config.toml, MISE_VERSION in .config/mise/install.sh, and the version input for jdx/mise-action in .github/actions/install-tools/action.yml.

Local installs, Docker/bootstrap scripts, and CI’s mise install step will all run the newer mise binary; no application code or mise tool pins in [tools] change in this diff.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 75f0f4c. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Sep 22, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.90%. Comparing base (6f8e10a) to head (75f0f4c).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9801   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.90%   65.90%           
=======================================
  Files        1905     1905           
  Lines      209988   209988           
  Branches     8218     8218           
=======================================
  Hits       138387   138387           
  Misses      70052    70052           
  Partials     1549     1549
Flag Coverage Δ
antsi 1.96% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.99% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 15.35% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 38.15% <ø> (ø)
error-stack 90.55% <ø> (ø)
harpc-codec 84.61% <ø> (ø)
harpc-net 96.26% <ø> (ø)
harpc-tower 67.11% <ø> (ø)
harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
harpc-wire-protocol 93.85% <ø> (ø)
hash-codec 72.09% <ø> (ø)
hash-config 83.57% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph 14.11% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-api 33.18% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-atlas 80.01% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
hash-graph-authentication 97.34% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-authorization 67.68% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-embeddings 91.54% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-postgres-store 31.94% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-store 51.71% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-temporal-versioning 50.53% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
hash-graph-validation 85.37% <ø> (ø)
hash-middleware 88.93% <ø> (ø)
hashql-ast 90.01% <ø> (ø)
hashql-compiletest 28.71% <ø> (ø)
hashql-core 81.41% <ø> (ø)
hashql-diagnostics 72.85% <ø> (ø)
hashql-eval 79.77% <ø> (ø)
hashql-hir 89.10% <ø> (ø)
hashql-mir 87.22% <ø> (ø)
hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.77% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 3.27% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 10.02% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 12.22% <ø> (ø)
problematic 89.25% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Sep 22, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

⚠️ 6 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚠️ as_constant < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ constant_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ constant_not_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ access < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ runtime_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A
⚠️ runtime_not_equal < 1 ns < 1 ns N/A

Comparing deps/jdx-mise-2026.x (75f0f4c) with main (6f8e10a)

Open in CodSpeed

@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.2 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.3 Sep 23, 2026
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.3 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.4 Sep 24, 2026
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.4 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.5 Sep 25, 2026
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.5 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.6 Sep 27, 2026
@hash-dependencies hash-dependencies Bot changed the title Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.6 Update dependency jdx/mise to v2026.9.7 Sep 28, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002 $$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527 $$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.189 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52 $$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108 $$4.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.882 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2 $$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.460 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$71.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 713 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$414 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.85 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$87.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$80.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 576 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.209 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$278 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.55 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.620 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.717 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$58.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 875 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$72.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$83.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$89.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 729 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$74.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 663 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$60.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 954 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 821 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$509 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.50 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

This branch had an error being deployed

1 failed and 4 active deployments
Preview – hash — 75f0f4c8 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
View deployment
Preview – petrinaut — 75f0f4c8 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
View deployment
Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens — 75f0f4c8 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
View deployment
pull-request — 75f0f4c8 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by hash-dependencies[bot] via Sourcemaps (@apps/hash-ai-worker-ts) #37463
Preview – petrinaut-docs — 75f0f4c8 Deployed Sep 28, 2026 by vercel[bot]
View deployment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants