Skip to content

landing: the workbench redacts, and says why that is not a box - #56

Merged
tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
landing/the-workbench-redacts
Nov 7, 2026
Merged

tannevaled merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
landing/the-workbench-redacts

Conversation

@tannevaled

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

The js/wasm card already said the workbench marks a passage. Redact is the opposite act, and the card now says what the difference is: the words come out of the file rather than getting a box drawn over them.

A box is the standard leak — the text is still in the content stream for anyone to copy out from under it — and this refuses, naming the reason, wherever it cannot remove the words completely.

One sentence added to the card at layouts/index.html:136. No layout, stylesheet or navigation change.

Companions: app#79 (the verb), docs#41 (the page), ops#69 (the library).

I will check the published page after the Pages build.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The js/wasm card already said the workbench marks a passage. Redact is
the opposite act and the card now says what the difference is: the words
come OUT of the file rather than getting a box drawn over them, because
a box is the standard leak — the text is still in the stream for anyone
to copy out from under it — and it refuses, naming the reason, wherever
it cannot remove them completely.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tannevaled
tannevaled merged commit 1b85559 into main Nov 7, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
@tannevaled
tannevaled deleted the landing/the-workbench-redacts branch November 7, 2026 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant