Skip to content

fix require pr issue for ci - #488

Closed
Loup-Garou911XD wants to merge 1 commit into
bombsquad-community:mainfrom
Loup-Garou911XD:main
Closed

Loup-Garou911XD wants to merge 1 commit into
bombsquad-community:mainfrom
Loup-Garou911XD:main

Conversation

@Loup-Garou911XD

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@Loup-Garou911XD
Loup-Garou911XD requested a balanced review from Copilot September 6, 2026 15:32

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The recursion guard currently allows bypassing main-branch CI based solely on a commit-message prefix, which should be tightened to the automation identity.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 2
  • Review effort level: Lite

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml
Comment on lines +58 to +60
# See CONSEQUENCE in the header. Do not remove without first moving the
# pushes back to an identity whose commits do not trigger workflows.
if: ${{ !startsWith(github.event.head_commit.message, '[ci] ') }}
Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml
Comment on lines +26 to +28
# The auto-commit steps below push with a PAT (secrets.PAT), NOT the
# default GITHUB_TOKEN. main's "require a pull request before merging"
# ruleset refuses GITHUB_TOKEN pushes outright:
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants