Skip to content

Judge prompts: guidance for de, nl, fr, fr-CA, es, it, hi, ko, ja - #251

Open
fanny-riols wants to merge 68 commits into
pr/fr/judge-shared-multilingual-rulesfrom
pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content
Open

fanny-riols wants to merge 68 commits into
pr/fr/judge-shared-multilingual-rulesfrom
pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

Conversation

@fanny-riols

@fanny-riols fanny-riols commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Why

Native speakers reviewed EVA conversations in 9 languages. Some judge errors they found come from not knowing how the language works.

#249 added a place in each judge prompt where language-specific text can be inserted. #250 changed the rules shared by all languages. This PR writes the language-specific text: one YAML file per judge in configs/prompts/judge_language_guidance/, with one entry per language. When a conversation is in that language, its entry is added to the judge prompt under a ### <Language>-specific guidance heading. English conversations get nothing, so English prompts don't change, except for one line in faithfulness (see below). Canadian French has no entry of its own: it gets the French entry, which includes the Québec items.

How each entry is written. Each entry groups its items by what they mean for the rating, and each group heading says the rating in that judge's own scale. For example, in tts_fidelity: "Correct, does not lower the rating", "Rating = 0 with entity_error".

Version bump

The versions of all metrics whose prompt or source changes in the stack (#249, #250 and this PR) are bumped once here. metrics_version is not changed. tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json is regenerated.

What changes, per judge

faithfulness (de, nl, fr, es, it, hi, ko, ja)

  • Letters and digits that sound alike, for each language. Examples: B/D/P/T in German, the 70–99 compound numbers in French ("soixante-dix-sept" = 77, but "soixante, dix-sept" = 60 17), B and V in Spanish, Q (キュー) and 9 (きゅう) in Japanese. The judge uses this list when it decides whether the assistant should have confirmed a value, or passed a wrong value to a tool.
  • Words borrowed from English that are normal in the language, so the judge doesn't count them as speaking the wrong language. Examples: "Ticket", "Login" in German; Hangul loanwords such as 로그인 in Korean; katakana loanwords such as パスワード in Japanese.
  • Hindi: English words and short phrases inside a Hindi sentence are normal and never a language violation. Only a whole sentence or turn in English is.
  • Japanese: an English term in Latin letters where a common Japanese term exists ("sick leave" instead of 病気休暇) is a minor issue, rated 2 and never 1.

agent_speech_fidelity, tts_fidelity, user_speech_fidelity (de, nl, fr, es, it, hi, ko, ja). These three files are generated from one source, so they say the same thing, with the rating wording adapted to each judge's scale. For each language they list:

  • How letters and digits are named in that language (German J is "jott", French W is "double-vé"), and which English names are often heard instead. If an English name sounds like another letter of the language (English E "ee" sounds like German I), the code has changed and the turn is an error.
  • Which spoken forms are correct, so the judge doesn't flag them: German and Dutch say units before tens (fünfundsiebzig = 75); French says 80 as "quatre-vingts"; Hindi uses ढाई बजे for 2:30; Korean uses native numbers for hours and Sino-Korean numbers for minutes; Japanese has special readings for counters (4時 is よじ).
  • Unusual but understandable forms, such as a literal clock reading in Hindi or a digit-by-digit year in Japanese. These are noted but are an error only if a native listener could take them for a different value.
  • Letters and digits that sound alike, such as M/N/L in German or 1/2 (일/이) in Korean. Audio that is ambiguous between the two is still an error, but the judge must not flag one only because its own transcription shows the other.
  • Sounds the judge can't tell apart from audio, such as B and V in Spanish, or E (이) and 2 (이) in Korean. The judge must not flag these from audio alone; it checks the intended text or the trace.
  • Words that are not the wrong language: loanwords, product names, codes. Hindi: English words and phrases inside a Hindi sentence are supported.

conciseness (fr, de, nl, hi, ko, ja)

  • The normal polite register of each language, which makes sentences longer without making them harder to follow: vous in French, Sie in German, honorifics in Hindi, keigo in Japanese, formal endings in Korean. The judge must not count these as filler.
  • Set service phrases, one per function, that are not filler: "Je vous écoute" in French, "Einen Moment bitte" in German, 잠시만 기다려 주세요 in Korean, かしこまりました in Japanese.
  • German: numbers and dates written out in words look long but are one piece of information, so they are not excess length.
  • Dutch is the exception: its service register is direct, so the politeness exception gives almost no extra room for courtesy wording.
  • What counts as filler (the same formula twice, stacked acknowledgements, a term followed by its synonym) is in the shared prompt from Judge prompts: shared rules for spelled codes, mixed-language speech, glosses and politeness #250, so the entries don't repeat it.

speakability (hi, ko, ja)

transcription_accuracy_key_entities (de, hi, ko, ja)

  • Spellings that count as the same value: German ü = ue and ß = ss; Hindi and English digit names; Korean 만-based numbers (1만 2천 = 12,000); Japanese katakana letter names and kana readings of kanji names.
  • Japanese: Q and 9 are different values even though they sound the same, and a different kanji for the same name reading is wrong once the user has said which kanji.

conversation_progression (ja, ko)

  • When a code or name has a homophone (Japanese Q and 9, or two kanji for the same name; Korean E and 2, or O and 5), and a lookup fails or the user corrects it, the assistant should ask which one was meant. Asking is never counted as redundant.

Validation

Before is #249, which renders the same prompts as main before this stack. After is this PR, which includes #250.

  • Unit tests.

  • Rendered prompts: every judge prompt was rendered in all 10 languages, with this PR and with Judge prompts: shared rules for spelled codes, mixed-language speech, glosses and politeness #250.

  • Judge validation datasets (docs/metrics/judge_validation_datasets/), production judge models, 3 runs per side, accuracy / macro-F1, mean ± std:

    Judge Records Before Judge prompts: per-language guidance slot #249 After this PR
    faithfulness (us.anthropic.claude-opus-4-6-v1) 137 70.07% ± 0.00% / 65.14% ± 0.26% 67.88% ± 0.73% / 62.18% ± 0.79%
    conciseness (gpt-5.2) 100 92.41% ± 0.84% / 85.40% ± 1.17% 93.25% ± 0.12% / 86.34% ± 0.71%
    conversation_progression (gpt-5.2) 136 76.47% ± 2.65% / 74.23% ± 2.95% 73.77% ± 1.12% / 70.78% ± 2.03%
    transcription_accuracy_key_entities (gpt-5.2), entity F1 / matched accuracy 38 83.14% ± 0.62% / 95.56% ± 0.95% 85.86% ± 1.77% / 95.04% ± 0.61%
    • The English conversation_progression and transcription_accuracy_key_entities prompts are identical before and after for English, so their differences (up to 3.5 points) show the run-to-run variation of these datasets.
    • Every other change is within that variation: no regression in English.
  • Re-scoring existing runs: 134 non-English trials (de, nl, fr, fr-CA, es, it, hi, ko, ja), including the conversations the native-speaker reviewers commented on (150 selected). The column "Noise" below is the variation between two runs of Judge prompts: shared rules for spelled codes, mixed-language speech, glosses and politeness #250 (before adding language guidance) on the same trials, with the same prompt. Agreement with the reviewers: their per-turn comments in German, French, Canadian French, Hindi and Japanese, turned into 234 verdicts saying the rating they saw should be lower, higher or the same; that count is in the "reviewer verdicts". We added "Agree before → after" column to count agreement of judge with reviewers.

    Judge Ratings Mean score before → after Ratings changed Noise Reviewer verdicts Agree before → after
    agent_speech_fidelity 982 turns 0.995 → 0.969 16 (1.6%) 0.7% 40 18% → 25% / 32%*
    user_speech_fidelity 952 turns 0.988 → 0.987 17 (1.8%) 1.2% 21 5% → 19% / 19%*
    faithfulness 134 conversations 0.463 → 0.425 23 (17%) 14% 26 50% → 58%
    conversation_progression 134 conversations 0.672 → 0.690 25 (19%) 22% 10 40% → 40%
    conciseness 992 turns 0.793 → 0.803 175 (18%) 18% 66 32% → 30%

    * For agent_speech_fidelity and user_speech_fidelity, "after" agreement uses Gemini 3.8 Flash (gemini-3.8-flash, Use Gemini 3.8 Flash as the default audio judge #263) as the audio judge.

    • Above noise: agent_speech_fidelity and user_speech_fidelity.
      • agent_speech_fidelity is stricter on spelled codes: English letter names in Italian codes ('el', 'dee', 'ef') and V said as 'doppia vu' are flagged, and real errors are caught (an extra digit in a German ID, 'REQ' said as 'EQ' in Dutch).
      • user_speech_fidelity catches entity errors such as शून्य dropped from a Hindi ID and an extra 'tre' in an Italian licence number; tts_fidelity flags English digit names in a French code.
    • speakability flags glosses (violation 5 from Judge prompts: shared rules for spelled codes, mixed-language speech, glosses and politeness #250), mostly in Japanese: "PIN(暗証番号)", or a code followed by its reading, "INC(アイ・エヌ・シー)". It also flags a code followed by its spelled-out letters in parentheses, "CASE-ACCT-… (C A S E …)", a borderline case that flips between runs.
    • Within noise: faithfulness, conversation_progression and conciseness. Conciseness changes as often in Spanish and Italian, which have no conciseness guidance.

Stack

  1. Judge prompts: per-language guidance slot #249 Place for language-specific text in judge prompts, and its loader.
  2. Judge prompts: shared rules for spelled codes, mixed-language speech, glosses and politeness #250 Shared judge rules (base of this PR).
  3. Judge prompts: guidance for de, nl, fr, fr-CA, es, it, hi, ko, ja #251 This PR: the language-specific text.
  4. Use Gemini 3.8 Flash as the default audio judge #263 Changes the audio judge from Gemini 3 Flash to Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Adds German guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
German conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (de): 10 rules
- conciseness (de): 2 rules
- faithfulness (de): 5 rules
- transcription_accuracy_key_entities (de): 2 rules
- tts_fidelity (de): 10 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (de): 10 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Dutch guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Dutch conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (nl): 9 rules
- conciseness (nl): 2 rules
- faithfulness (nl): 4 rules
- tts_fidelity (nl): 9 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (nl): 9 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds French and Canadian French guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
French and Canadian French conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (fr): 9 rules
- agent_speech_fidelity (fr-CA): 3 rules
- conciseness (fr): 3 rules
- conciseness (fr-CA): 1 rule
- faithfulness (fr): 3 rules
- faithfulness (fr-CA): 2 rules
- tts_fidelity (fr): 9 rules
- tts_fidelity (fr-CA): 3 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (fr): 9 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (fr-CA): 3 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Spanish guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Spanish conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (es): 9 rules
- faithfulness (es): 4 rules
- tts_fidelity (es): 9 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (es): 9 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Italian guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Italian conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (it): 8 rules
- faithfulness (it): 3 rules
- tts_fidelity (it): 8 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (it): 8 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Hindi guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Hindi conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (hi): 9 rules
- conciseness (hi): 3 rules
- faithfulness (hi): 5 rules
- speakability (hi): 3 rules
- transcription_accuracy_key_entities (hi): 4 rules
- tts_fidelity (hi): 9 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (hi): 9 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Korean guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Korean conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (ko): 7 rules
- conciseness (ko): 2 rules
- faithfulness (ko): 4 rules
- transcription_accuracy_key_entities (ko): 2 rules
- tts_fidelity (ko): 7 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (ko): 7 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
Adds Japanese guidance to the judge prompts. It is rendered only for
Japanese conversations, so other languages are unchanged.

- agent_speech_fidelity (ja): 10 rules
- conciseness (ja): 3 rules
- conversation_progression (ja): 4 rules
- faithfulness (ja): 5 rules
- speakability (ja): 3 rules
- transcription_accuracy_key_entities (ja): 3 rules
- tts_fidelity (ja): 10 rules
- user_speech_fidelity (ja): 10 rules

Review by a native speaker: check that each rule is correct and natural
for the language, and that nothing important is missing.
The guidance slot, the shared rules and the per-language guidance change
the prompt or source of these metrics, so their scores are not
comparable with earlier versions:

- conciseness v0.1 -> v0.2
- conversation_progression v0.2 -> v0.3
- faithfulness v0.3 -> v0.4
- speakability v0.3 -> v0.4
- agent_speech_fidelity v0.4 -> v0.5
- tts_fidelity v0.3 -> v0.4
- user_speech_fidelity v0.2 -> v0.3
- transcription_accuracy_key_entities v0.4 -> v0.5
- user_behavioral_fidelity v0.1 -> v0.2 (source only: shared base class)

metrics_version is not changed.
…-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
- agent_speech_fidelity: drop the entries that rated a clearly spoken
  but wrong value 0 ('halb drei' for 3:30, soixante-sept for 77, ...).
  The judge leaves the value to faithfulness and rates articulation only,
  as in its own "$315" example. The reading facts stay.
- tts_fidelity hi and ja: a mispronounced non-entity word is no longer
  garbled_hallucination, which means unintelligible noise. It rates 0
  only if it changes the meaning.
- Speech fidelity nl, es, it and ko: the first bullet now lists the
  English letter and digit names typically heard, as de and fr do,
  instead of restating the shared rule in three variants.
- Example values that occur in the datasets are replaced with synthetic
  ones (codes, user names, a surname). "M comme Marcel" stays: it is the
  standard French spelling alphabet.
- The metric signature fixture is regenerated.
- Speech fidelity: add the regional 'viertel drei' = 2:15 next to 'drei
  viertel drei' = 2:45.
- Speech fidelity: drop "Meier/Meyer-type spelling variants are fine";
  the shared prompt already says it.
- Conciseness: keep the written-out date example and drop the restated
  shared rule.
- Conciseness: "Ik ga meteen kijken" and "Ik ga uw reservering er direct
  bij zoeken" are single hold phrases, so they are fine on their own.
  They are filler only when stacked with another hold phrase or lead-in.
- Speech fidelity: "bee, cee, dee, pee, tee sound like English" was
  phonetically wrong (Dutch B is /beː/, close to English "bay"). It now
  says these written names are the Dutch names.
- Speech fidelity: the acronym exemption covers acronyms used as words
  or names (ID, FMLA, I-9). The letters of a spelled code or identifier
  still need Dutch names, as the rest of the guidance says.
- Speech fidelity: the vowel-change example used 'veer', which is not a
  digit. The rule now says "makes a digit unrecognisable or turns it
  into another digit".
- Speech fidelity: drop "Upper or lower case need not be spoken", which
  is not specific to Dutch.
French:
- Faithfulness: a code with a compound-number sequence no longer always
  needs digit-by-digit confirmation. Flag the missing confirmation only
  if the trace shows the ambiguity mattered, as the shared rule says.
- Conciseness: "Je peux vous aider avec ça ?" is a calque; use "Puis-je
  vous aider ?". Vous-forms are described as normal register instead of
  restating the shared spoken-length rule.
- Speech fidelity: dix-huit is liaison, not elision. 'trois heures et
  quart' = 3:15 moves here from fr-CA, since it is standard French.

Canadian French (adds to the French text, which fr-CA also gets):
- Faithfulness: drop the compound-number bullet, which only repeated fr.
- Speech fidelity: drop the bullet that repeated the fr and shared rules
  on English letter names and phrases.
- Speech fidelity: the time bullet now gives the Québec forms 'trois
  heures moins quart' (without 'le') and the colloquial 'quart à trois',
  both 2:45, so the fr 'moins le quart' entry doesn't reject them.
- Conciseness: keep the warm-phrase examples, drop the restated rule.
- Speech fidelity: the B/V bullet said 'be' and 've' sound the same,
  then called 'be' for V a letter error. Now only a clearly
  distinguishing name is a letter error: 'uve' / 've corta' said for B,
  or 'be larga' / 'be de Barcelona' said for V.
- Faithfulness: the target is European Spanish, so note that with
  distinción, C before e/i and Z (/θ/) are distinct from S (/s/). The
  S/C/Z merge applies to seseo speakers.
Speech fidelity:
- "a Italian listener" → "an Italian listener".
- The realistic wrong date form is "l'uno marzo", not "il uno marzo".
- Spell out the 'Gioia' example: the letter J read as the word 'Gioia'
  instead of 'i lunga'.
EVA supports Hindi–English code-switching, so the judges no longer
penalise English words or phrases inside a Hindi sentence.
- Faithfulness: English loanwords, procedural terms ("Employee ID",
  "last name") and short phrases ("six digits") are never a language
  violation, in either script. Only a whole English sentence or turn is.
  This replaces the rule that rated repeated English procedural phrases
  at most 2, which also contradicted the shared rating scale. The list of
  Hindi equivalents goes with it, including उपनाम, which usually means
  nickname rather than last name.
- Faithfulness: evidence is a whole English sentence or turn, not Latin
  script, which on its own says nothing about the language spoken.
- Speech fidelity: English words and phrases inside a Hindi sentence are
  not wrong language. For tts_fidelity and user_speech_fidelity, only a
  whole English sentence that is not in the intended text is.
- Speech fidelity: the mispronunciation examples now say what the wrong
  pronunciation sounds like ('aisle' said as 'es-le'); the others gave
  none and are dropped.
Faithfulness: 공 (0) does not sound like the letter O. The real
collisions are that the letter O (오) is also the digit 5 (오), and that
O is easily confused with 0 in writing.
Speech fidelity:
- Counter readings: ななじ is as standard as しちじ for 7時, and じっぷん
  is a standard reading of 10分; both are added.
- く (9) is not confusable with シー (C) or いち (1); drop it from that
  list.
- Keep the katakana examples of a letter group read as a word, and drop
  the "codes must be read letter by letter" rule, which is not specific
  to Japanese.
…-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
The fabricating_tool_parameters note on confusable letters now points
to the language-specific guidance, which this branch adds. The note is
in the shared prompt, so the English faithfulness prompt gets the
pointer too; "if any" covers languages without guidance.
Group each language entry by what its items mean for the rating, with the
rating in the judge's own scale in each group heading. Move the fr-CA
entries into fr, so Canadian French gets the French guidance only. Carry
confusable pairs and homophones already listed for a language in one judge
over to that language's entries in the other judges, and add Korean
entries for speakability glosses and conversation_progression homophones.
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…es agree

Dutch: an acronym used as a word in a sentence may use English letter
names, but the letters of a spelled code still follow the English letter
names rule. Hindi: English digit names are correct when the text writes the
digit as a numeral or in English, and only unusual when it spells out the
Hindi digit word.

agent_speech_fidelity, tts_fidelity and user_speech_fidelity share their
per-language facts; a test now checks that the groups whose items do not
depend on the rating scale list the same items in all three files.
Items such as "Stacked acknowledgements: Parfait, très bien, d'accord,
merci beaucoup" or a list of loanwords could be read as the only cases
to flag or to accept. They now say they are examples (e.g., such as, for
example), and the loanword headings say the list is not complete.
…rd note for ko and hi

Merge the latest shared judge rules. Dutch conciseness no longer lists
lead-ins that announce the next step as filler. Korean and Hindi
faithfulness now say, as Japanese does, that a transcript rendering a
spoken loanword in Latin letters is not evidence of English speech.

@tiffanyannedo tiffanyannedo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed JA additions to the prompts. Made some comments/suggestions.

**Correct, does not lower the rating:**
- These are the Japanese names of Latin letters in a spelled code, in katakana; a letter said this way is correct, even with an English-like accent: エー, ビー, シー, ディー, イー, エフ, ジー, エイチ/エッチ, アイ, ジェー, ケー, エル, エム, エヌ, オー, ピー, キュー, アール, エス, ティー, ユー, ブイ/ヴィー, ダブリュー, エックス, ワイ, ゼット/ズィー.
- These are the Japanese digit names in a spelled code; a digit said this way is correct: ゼロ/れい, いち, に, さん, よん, ご, ろく, なな, はち, きゅう.
- This is how numbers are read with counters in Japanese; a number read this way is correct (し, しち, く are right here): 4時 よじ, 7時 しちじ/ななじ, 9時 くじ, 4月 しがつ, 7月 しちがつ, 9月 くがつ, 1日 ついたち, 2日 ふつか, 4日 よっか, 8日 ようか, 20日 はつか, 24日 にじゅうよっか, 1分 いっぷん, 10分 じゅっぷん/じっぷん, 2人 ふたり, 4人 よにん.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ななじ is not a way to say 7時. But, 7月 can be said as なながつ.
Dates all have special readings. Should this be exhaustive?
じっぷん is not a way to say 10分 and mean the time/duration, it is a way to say "enough"
Same with counting people, should be this be exhaustive?

Suggested change
- This is how numbers are read with counters in Japanese; a number read this way is correct (し, しち, く are right here): 4時 よじ, 7時 しちじ/ななじ, 9時 くじ, 4月 しがつ, 7月 しちがつ, 9月 くがつ, 1日 ついたち, 2日 ふつか, 4日 よっか, 8日 ようか, 20日 はつか, 24日 にじゅうよっか, 1分 いっぷん, 10分 じゅっぷん/じっぷん, 2人 ふたり, 4人 よにん.
- This is how numbers are read with counters in Japanese; a number read this way is correct (し, しち, く are right here): 4時 よじ, 7時 しちじ, 9時 くじ, 4月 しがつ, 7月 しちがつ/なながつ, 9月 くがつ, 1日 ついたち, 2日 ふつか, 3日 みっか, 4日 よっか, 5日 いつか, 6日 むいか, 7日 なのか, 8日 ようか, 9日 ここのか, 10日 とおか, 14日 じゅうよっか, 20日 はつか, 24日 にじゅうよっか, 1分 いっぷん, 10分 じゅっぷん, 1人 ひとり, 2人 ふたり, 4人 よにん.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How exhaustive would that be? If it's just as big as these rows, then yes, please.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, the suggestions are all the ones I think we should add

fanny-riols and others added 5 commits November 12, 2026 13:37
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/judge_prompts_en.json
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/judge_prompts_en.json
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
Co-authored-by: tiffanyannedo <142948481+tiffanyannedo@users.noreply.github.com>
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/judge_prompts_en.json
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…ntent' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	configs/prompts/judge_language_guidance/agent_speech_fidelity.yaml
#	configs/prompts/judge_language_guidance/tts_fidelity.yaml
#	configs/prompts/judge_language_guidance/user_speech_fidelity.yaml
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json
…the Japanese review, as in tts_fidelity and user_speech_fidelity
…rules' into pr/fr/judge-language-guidance-content

# Conflicts:
#	tests/fixtures/judge_prompts_en.json
#	tests/fixtures/metric_signatures.json

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants