Skip to content

docs(step7): hosts ready is not authority to collect (T0-0) - #353

Open
PhysShell wants to merge 1 commit into
claude/p-022-analysis-wiring-mwhqlwfrom
claude/p022-t0-0-authority-ordering
Open

PhysShell wants to merge 1 commit into
claude/p-022-analysis-wiring-mwhqlwfrom
claude/p022-t0-0-authority-ordering

Conversation

@PhysShell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Authority ordering only. No threshold, no statistic, no gate, no number.

The defect

The step-7 status block ended the host gate with:

SINGLE STEP-7 COLLECTION AUTHORISED automatically after that gate.

That makes the first training collection start on an infrastructure event — two dedicated hosts appear, the binding freezes, and the clock is legally free to run. Nothing in the chain requires the rules for reading that data to exist first, so the protocol could be written after a look at what the training produced. That is the one failure mode preregistration exists to prevent.

hosts ready + binding frozen              != authority to collect
hosts ready + binding frozen + T0 frozen  == collection may become eligible

What changes

Revoked: the automatic authorisation of the first step-7 collection, and only that.

Unchanged and still authorised: environment capture tooling, environment provisioning, the execution binding, and every part of #263-A instrumentation accepted before this amendment. Nothing is reopened.

Added as a prerequisite: the pretraining protocol freeze (T0), in its own document, before any training, first or decisive collection.

No digest moves — this file is outside all three frozen source sets — and the step-7 controls still pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_018xhcg5opoFbSTdYHpkSXCh

The status block authorised the first step-7 collection AUTOMATICALLY once two
dedicated hosts existed and the binding froze. That makes a training collection
start on an infrastructure event, with nothing requiring the rules for reading
the data to exist first — so the protocol could be written after a look at what
the training produced. That is the failure mode preregistration exists to
prevent, and it is an ordering-of-authority defect, not a defect in anything
already accepted.

    hosts ready + binding frozen              != authority to collect
    hosts ready + binding frozen + T0 frozen  == collection may become eligible

Revoked: the automatic authorisation of the first step-7 collection, and only
that. Unchanged: environment capture tooling, provisioning, the execution
binding, and all accepted #263-A instrumentation. Added: the pretraining
protocol freeze (T0) as a prerequisite to any training, first or decisive
collection.

This amendment carries no threshold, no statistic and no gate — those are T0's,
in a separate document. No digest moves: this file is outside all three frozen
source sets, and the step-7 controls still pass 12/12.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018xhcg5opoFbSTdYHpkSXCh
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 14c153e0-3a37-46ba-a5ed-07ad49f56ad9

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants